EDITORIAL: Neutral Force

PHILIPPINE National Police Chief Gen. Rommel Francisco Marbil serves as a strong reminder of the fundamental principle that law enforcement must remain apolitical. His warning against partisan activities among active-duty officers highlights the crucial role that the PNP plays in upholding democracy, ensuring public trust, and maintaining order without bias.

The controversy arose when a group of retired PNP officers who are Philippine National Police Academy (PNPA) alumni publicly declared their support for Vice President Sara Duterte amid her impeachment proceedings.

While retired officers have the right to express their opinions, the issue becomes problematic when active-duty members engage in political partisanship. Marbil’s stance is clear: any officer proven to be involved in such activities will face sanctions, including possible dismissal.

This firm position is not just about enforcing internal discipline; it is about preserving the credibility of the PNP. A professional police force should never be seen as an extension of any political faction, regardless of personal loyalties or affiliations.

Public confidence in law enforcement hinges on its neutrality. If the police are perceived as favoring one political side, their ability to fairly enforce laws and protect citizens without bias is severely undermined.

The principle of non-partisanship is enshrined in Philippine law. Under the Omnibus Election Code and PNP regulations, officers are explicitly prohibited from engaging in political activities, except when casting their own votes. This ensures that law enforcement agencies function independently, focusing on their sworn duty to serve the public rather than political figures or parties.

History offers sobering lessons on what happens when security forces become politicized. Around the world, nations where police and military personnel openly align with political movements often experience unrest, weakened institutions, and loss of public trust. The Philippines itself has seen periods where law enforcement was used as a political tool, leading to deep-seated distrust among citizens. Avoiding such a scenario is paramount.

PNP spokesperson Brig. Gen. Jean Fajardo clarified that the three active-duty officers from PNPA Class of 1991 did not sign the statement of support for Duterte. This distinction is critical. While retired officers can express their personal views freely, active members must remain neutral, guided by their duty to serve all Filipinos regardless of political leanings.

The impeachment of Vice President Duterte, backed by 215 lawmakers, is a significant political event. However, it should be settled within the constitutional process—through legal and legislative means, not through partisan involvement from the police or military. The role of law enforcement is to maintain peace and order, not to interfere in political disputes.

As the country crosses this politically charged period, the PNP’s commitment to professionalism must remain steadfast. The leadership’s strong stance against partisanship is reassuring, but vigilance is necessary. Any indication that the police are being drawn into political conflicts could erode public trust and compromise democratic stability.

For the PNP to truly embody its motto—“To Serve and Protect”—it must ensure that its officers uphold integrity, fairness, and impartiality at all times. The Filipino people deserve nothing less.